Skip to content

Human Slavery & Trafficking in the USA

August 21, 2011

E.J. Manning

slavery to childrenTo define slavery on any level is a hot topic, whether forced labor, labor in bondage, slavery or trafficking. Today, several standards are used.

CNN claims that “slavery occurs when one person completely controls another person, using violence or the threat of violence to maintain that control, exploits them economically, pays them nothing and they cannot walk away.” This is a nice general definition except for the part about paying nothing. Underemployment and underpayment, which is robbery through force or coercion is not addressed. Nations love legalized slavery that can be justified. Even the “generous and freedom-espousing” United States has become a robber baron of the people while pretending to be interested in the rights of citizens and democracy. Other modern nations mandate similar policies in the name of what is often an arbitrary degree of fairness.

The United Nations has made themselves a political authority on the topic of human slavery and trafficking. What is interesting is that they try to deny any definition of slavery and instead focus on human trafficking, particularly against women.

Human trafficking is defined in the U.N. Trafficking Protocol as “the recruitment, transport, transfer, harboring or receipt of a person by such means as threat or use of force or other forms of coercion, of adbuction, or fraud or deception for the purpose of exploitation.”

The definition on trafficking consists of three core elements:

1) the recruitment, transportation, transfer, harboring or receipt of persons

2) includes threat of or use of force, deception, coercion, abuse of power or position of vulnerability

3) trafficking which is always exploitation. In the words of the Trafficking Protocol, article 3 “exploitation shall include, at a minimum, the exploitation of the prostitution of others or other forms of sexual exploitation, forced labor or services, slavery or practices similar to slavery, servitude or the removal of organs.

kangaroo court
legal rights and lawbreaking

The United Nations already knows that a number of modern nations are on the fence where their definition of human trafficking is concerned. How? This is simply based on how they treat and handle their own citizens. However, this is simply ignored as legal behavior where space-holding nations are concerned. While these definitions are fairly broad by design, you can see that using the United Nations protocol, even the major sponsor and shareholder of the United Nations, the United States, is riding the borders of the illegal human trafficking of its citizens through the repeated violations of Constitutional Rights of citizens through a kangaroo court system based on unequal representation, through the adversarial execution of the Bradley Amendment for Social Security which results in jailing, punitive fines, enforcement of poverty (economic oppression) and removing the ability of citizens to make a living.

When you haul a man or woman to jail with the intent to coerce him or her into paying child support or any other civil obligation, you satisfy the first, second and third definitions of human trafficking. The government is transporting, transferring, harboring and receiving citizens into custody in order to exploit them against the guaranteed rights of an American citizen. They seek to coerce and bully, to exploit into forced labor and servitude against their will and against the original provisions of the nation. This doesn’t matter, however, because of “legal precedence,” the current standard of justice in the United States.

The United Nations says that this matters. Too bad nobody is listening.

captiveIt has been said that slaves are not allowed to walk away from their jobs. This is hardly the case. Many cannot work. In wealthier nations, these poor souls may be on disability through no real fault of their own. Even with slavery “outlawed,” estimates are that 27 million slaves fit the classical definition of slaves by world authorities, even though that definition is not crystal clear. More and more, citizens are becoming bonded laborers in their own nations as the leaders spend money like water to pander and garner influence. Poverty is cast upon the people as if it is a badge of honor to sacrifice for the better of the nation.

Nations like the United States pretend to help as they play political and social slight of hand.

Consider this. For those that are not at the bottom of the social ladder, ending poverty and oppression would be a disaster. If there were no poverty or oppression in the world, who would plow the fields? Who would harvest our vegetables and pick blueberries? Who would work in the rendering plants? Who would clean our toilets? Who would pay the bills even though nobody really does, preferring to borrow to pay another day? No wonder people at the high end are not rushing to solve the poverty and oppression. The authorities and many with influence benefit from poverty and oppression, even by violating the rights of other human beings. For many, poverty and legalized oppression is not a problem, but an asset.

The CNN Freedom Project
Care to comment? Follow this link to Gather.com!

 

Advertisements
One Comment leave one →
  1. Samuel Mark Gaddie Sr. permalink
    August 22, 2011 1:46 am

    Every State that is an Administrator of Child Support there is a Child Support Handbook that is implemented through a system. It is a Federally funded Child Support Enforcement System. There are two sides of this Handbook, Judicial and Administrative both have the same effect of Law. You have a judicial Obligation judgement and an Administrative Order. These Guidelines are very strict in compliance Laws,Statutes and Administrative Regulations. Each Participate when entered into this system receives a Federal IV-D #. This number opens a case in this Enforcement system. A caseworker is assigned a case and he or she is in charge of this case and has the responsibility of making sure that all the correct information is entered into the system. This is were the problem first comes into play. You have uneducated individuals trying to manage a very complex and integrated system. By Statute each State is responsible for the education of caseworkers and information that is entered. What is happening at first initiation of a recorded activity reflected in this system which is called Protected Health Information or better known as disclosures the information which is mandated by each Child Support Handbook for each State is not in Compliance with the Handbook it is better known as HIPAA. Define Disclosure ” to reveal” . Each Handbook is very clear about PHI and accounting disclosures. This terminology you will not see at the county level or even State level even though there are numerous Statutes and regulations at the State level and county level. Statutes handled by the State, Administrative Regulations by the State and the County together. It is all in the Child Support Handbooks of each individual State. One of the best things we can do as far as combating this type of Administrative Federally funded entity is seek resolve of issues out of court. We are not aware of the Administrative side of this beast that is sucking the very life from our Families and children. Remember that Administrative Orders has the same effect as Law. But we are not being told this. It is like the counties are doing the dirty work while the State sits back and enjoys the monetary benefits. They have made the enforcement so convenient with the counties, they are experts at ENFORCEMENT. With every CS-73 Withholding Order their is a small print about the obligations being questioned its called a mistake of fact, they send to our employers and we are entitled to an Administrative Hearing to Question the obligation. But in BIG BOLD print quotes Statutes about the penalties for non-compliance to our employers. This already has a negative reflection on us to our employers and of course we don’t see the Withholding Order and of course our employer, their main concern is COMPLIANCE. They automatically assume we are in arrears because of BIG BOLD print about what they are going to do if they don’t comply. If we do go to court a request for a jury needs to be our resolve in these matters taking it out of the hands of a Corrupt Judge’s. We as noncustodial parents got to beware that we a have right to know our monthly child support /obligation according to the Child Support Handbook they have to match dollar for dollar. Without Obligation there is no Support. Our credit card company’s are not allowed to make False accusations about our charges but we allow this Bias-Child support enforcement system to get away with it. We are uneducated and to trustworthy of a system that really is a fail safe system. Every time someone goes to Court we need to learn more about the Law and bring it before a JURY. They will be a lot more easy to persuade with nothing but cut and dry plain written Law. Then we won’t hear about interpretation of the Law. In closing even though I could write for days about this issue. Their is one thing all IV-D #’s have in common, that is their is a caseworker sitting behind a screen of a PHI computer that is property of the U.S.Federal Government when the case opens the Introduction screen will have a warning from the IRS WARNING BANNER it WARNS ” This system may contain Government information, which is restricted to authorized users ONLY. Unauthorized access, use, misuse or modification of this system or of the data contained herein or in transit to/from this system constitutes a violation of Title18, United States Code, Section 1030, and may subject the individual to Criminal and Civil penalties pursuant to Title 26, United States Code, Sections 7213(a), 7213 (the Taxpayer Browsing Protection Act), and 7431. This system and equipment are subject to monitoring to ensure proper performance of applicable security features or procedures. Such monitoring may result in the acquisition, recording and analysis of data being communicated, transmitted, processed or stored in this system by a user. If monitoring reveals possible evidence of criminal activity, such evidence may be provided to Law Enforce Personnel”. ANYONE USING THIS SYSTEM EXPRESSLY CONSENTS TO SUCH MONITORING. Everyone that is entered into this system is entitled to a full and complete PHI and accounting disclosure statement it is a free and public document.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: